AHRC Kluge Fellowship at the Library of Congress

Well – again, it’s terrible looking at this blog and how little I’ve updated it over the past year. But it has been because I’m busily working away and not because I can’t think of anything to write. So I’m continuing the blog catch-up! This time two months ago I was newly  arrived in Washinton DC, amazed at the snow (I got here the week after Snowpocalypse 2016) getting over the jet-lag before my first day of a five month AHRC Fellow at the Kluge Center in the Library of Congress.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

This has been a long time in the making. I first heard of the scheme in the first semester of my PhD through a lecturer in my department, who simply forwarded on an email to a group of PhD students publicising an open day about it in London. At first glance I wasn’t sure if I’d be interested in going to it – I’d only just started after all, and was just getting back into studying after a break of three years. However, when I read more about what the scheme offered I realised what a fantastic opportunity it was, I booked a spot on the open day so that I could hear from AHRC representatives and past Fellows. I made the application deadline in January 2015 and at the start of July, got the good news that my application had been selected while I was away on field research in Australia. I couldn’t believe it and had to wait for hours to be able to tell my partner and family as I didn’t want to ring and wake them in the middle of the night!

The AHRC’s scheme offers placements of between two and six months at different institutions across the USA, China and Japan (the ESRC has a similar scheme but its placements are all at the Library of Congress). I applied for a placement at the Library of Congress, primarily because the American Folklife Center there holds unique collections of recordings and associated material of great value to my work on the Cornish in the USA – I simply can’t access this material anywhere else.  The surrounding materials in Historic Newspaper, Recorded Sound and Performing Arts Reading Rooms are also mines of information which I’ll be digging into during my time here.

So after months of anticipation, I’m now settled into my residency is in the Kluge Center. In terms of numbers, there are fifteen or so AHRC/ESRC PhD fellows, twelve Kluge Fellows, and the current Distinguished Visiting Scholar, Professor Peter Brooks of Princeton. We each have a little office or ‘Klubicle’ (I didn’t come up with this but I wish I had) that we can order books to. As part of my residency here I have to give a Work In Progress talk about my project and specifically what I’ve been doing at the Library. These usually happen about two thirds of the way through a residency, so that there’s time to follow up on any feedback – I imagine that I’ll be scheduling mine in late April or early June. This is in front of the other students, Fellows, staff in the Center, and any Reading Room staff you want to invite. Having seen two WIPs from current scholars they seem fairly informal in terms of how the presentation occurs, but since you’re surrounded by extremely sharp academics with wildly different fields of expertise, the questions are what to look out for!

I’ll be posting more about what I’m actually doing my with Fellowship soon – but in the meantime you can find out more about the AHRC’s International Placement Scheme here, and check the #ahrcips hashtag for tweets from current and past Fellows. I’ve also written a blog post about this for my department in Cardiff, which you can read here.

Progression viva, conferences, plane tickets

So, the last month has been very busy with wrapping up my year 1 paperwork and doing a couple of presentations – alongside getting the logistics sorted for my research trip to South Australia.

First was the Breaking Boundaries interdisciplinary humanities and social sciences post-graduate conference at my home institution, Cardiff University. I sent an abstract in to this conference proposing first a presentation and secondly as a poster regarding the different Cornish notions of patriotism in South Australia which I have been working on this year in preparation for my fieldwork. Happily I was invited to give a presentation, so I set about preparing something which was specific enough to be interesting and show what I’m focussing on, but friendly to non-specialists outside my discipline. I had 15 minutes to talk with 5 minutes or so of questions, so I prepared my script and slides, and a musical example. I personally find public speaking a real challenge so I practiced my presentation on my partner and a couple of friends a number of times to check I was within the time limit and it flowed smoothly, and would guide the audience through my topic without losing them. On the day my musical example actually worked! Hurrah! (My musical example didn’t work at the last conference I did; I managed to get a laugh out of it but I was wary of it happening again). Despite the horrendous nerves, mouth going so dry and throat seizing up so much I actually started mispronouncing my words (totally normal for me) once I started speaking I was happy with how I was coming across, and at the end of the presentation the questions were interesting and insightful. Another great feature of the conference was a keynote from anthropologist Kate Fox, who gave a fantastic speech titled ‘Popping The Academic Bubble: Risks and Rewards of Writing for a Popular Audience’. This is worth a blog post all of its own so I’ll get thinking about it!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Next up was my end of Year 1 progression viva with my supervisor and Director of Postgraduate Studies. Having chatted about it a couple of times with previous PhD students, both in my school and outside it, I was given the impression that having done a fair bit of writing this year that I should be at least on track. However, as ever I did manage to work myself into a bit of a state about it. ‘What if they ask me tough questions about theory and method?’ ‘Should I be armed with numbers of analogous traditions and communities to compare and contrast?’ ‘What if they spring a question on me that takes the legs out from under my research?’ These are all things I was worried about happening. However – in reality it was more like a friendly chat about what I’d done so far and the issues I’d uncovered, and how I saw my research progressing. Not as intimidating as I had convinced myself, but I would always much rather over-prepare than under-prepare (this does result in me spending too much time on simple things which could be dealt with quickly and easily though. Swings and roundabouts).

And finally, yesterday I took part in my School’s own post-graduate study day. This was also a one-day conference with a number of PhD students of various stages giving a paper on their research. There are two of these a year, and it’s compulsory to attend one. I really enjoyed hearing about everyone’s research, from the ancient etymology of lute-naming, to the emancipation of Roma peoples and their role as musicians in Romania, to the changing gender roles in the panegyria, religious and music tradition in Greece (here’s a link to the PG students in my department). I had proposed to talk about a different aspect of my project to the previous conference so it wasn’t simply a case of giving the same speech over again. With the viva and preparing for the research trip I didn’t have much time to prepare a script that I would read word for word, so although I had an iPad with me that I had prompts from, the presentation wasn’t exactly ad-libbed, but I wasn’t reading from notes either. As a result I felt that I used far less formal language than the others; but I think showed what I was doing and managed to answer the questions well enough.

However, the stand-out event of the day was the mock lecturing job interview. A student in the final year of his PhD volunteered to be interviewed by a panel of three lecturers. He had prepared a CV for a recent job advert for a musicology lecturer, which were both handed out to attendees so that we could see how he had responded to the criteria. He left the room while the lecturers took us through the process of how interviews at universities in the UK tend to work and discussed the types of questions which they would ask. He was then called into the room and the interview lasted about 20 minutes, beginning with gentler questions like ‘tell us about how you came to research your subject’ and then more direct questions along the lines of ‘how do you see yourself contributing to REF 2020 in this institution’, ‘how would you implement research-led teaching in your role’, ’what is your understanding of equal opportunities’, and ‘can you outline a dream module you would teach’. After the interview was over, together with the ‘candidate’ and the lecturers we discussed how well he had responded. A lot of key issues coming out; not just in terms of interview technique and presenting your strengths and skills, but also the types of necessary knowledge about the department you’re applying to, their aims and goals and the broader academic environment. If there are any other PGs out there reading this, I highly recommend doing an exercise like this at your own institution if you can find willing lecturers!

And in amongst all that, I *think* I am up to date getting all my forms in to not only my own department but to my funding body so that hopefully they will approve me to continue to the second year. And making sure I have ALL THE THINGS ready for the research trip – passport, plane tickets, visa, driving licence, passport, AV kit, computer, adaptors, passport, correct luggage for the allowance, lists of archive material to look at, passport … you get the picture.

So this probably all reads as either terrifying or tedious – that’s kind of how I view conferences and form-filling respectively – but both are definitely necessary and useful. Comments and feedback all welcome – anyone got experiences of progression vivas or internal conferences to share?